ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Human neutrophil lipocalin, procalcitonin, c-reactive protein, and leucocyte count for prediction of bacterial sepsis in emergency department patients.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pancreatic Stone Protein as an Early Predictor of Adverse Events in Patients with Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Pilot Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Shengmai Injection as adjunctive therapy in sepsis and septic shock: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Establishment and validation of a 28-day mortality prediction model based on the lactate dehydrogenase/albumin ratio in patients with severe pneumonia.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed identification of bacterial sepsis undermines the initiation of antibiotic and other time-sensitive treatments in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to investigate the performance of human-neutrophil lipocalin (HNL), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and leucocyte count in conjunction with clinical scores for the early prediction of bacterial sepsis.
methodsPatients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a suspected infection and a national early warning score (NEWS) ≥ 2 at triage were screened for eligibility. The study biomarkers were measured at ED presentation. The primary outcome was bacterial sepsis, defined as an acute bacterial infection and an increase of ≥ 2 points in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (Sepsis-3 criteria). The diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers for bacterial sepsis was calculated using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis and its area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsIn total, we included 421 patients, of whom 155 (36.8%) had bacterial sepsis. For the prediction of bacterial sepsis, PCT outperformed the other biomarkers with an AUC (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.72-0.82), compared to HNL 0.72 (0.67-0.77), CRP 0.71 (0.66-0.76), and leucocyte count 0.64 (0.59-0.70). A combination of serum HNL with NEWS and SOFA at presentation had the best predictive value for bacterial sepsis at 48 h after ED presentation (AUC 0.83).
conclusionOur findings do not support the routine use of serum HNL as a tool in the prediction of bacterial sepsis in patients presenting to the ED. A combination of biomarkers (serum HNL or CRP plus leucocytes) with NEWS and SOFA at presentation outperformed inflammatory biomarkers used individually in the prediction of bacterial sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.