Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598494›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2025

Analysing longitudinal wearable physical activity data using non-stationary time series models.

Melina Del Angel, Matthew Nunes, Oliver Peacock, Ewan Cranwell, Dylan Thompson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Every move counts: but some more than others.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melina Del AngelDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7 AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-5769
Matthew NunesDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7 AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4719-2690
Oliver PeacockDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7 AY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2435-2903
Ewan CranwellKiActiv®, 1 Duchess Street, London, W1 W 6 AN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9208-864X
Dylan ThompsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7 AY, UK. spsdt@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6312-1518

Funding

MRC National Prevention Research Initiative MR/J00040X/1University of Bath and KiActiv® 219160340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable devices have emerged as a new technology for monitoring physical activity over time. Conventional approaches to wearable physical activity data have tended to ignore temporal changes and, instead, have typically analysed summative measures and/or snapshots (e.g., averages over a specific period). In this report, we aimed to develop a novel statistical method to analyse longitudinal physical activity data accounting for the temporal structure in the data.

methodsThis research used secondary data from the Multidimensional Individualised Physical Activity (MIPACT) randomized controlled trial. Physical activity data over the 12-week intervention for 80 participants (28 women) aged between 43 and 70 years old met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. We modelled the temporal dynamic of each participant using a Trend Locally Stationary Wavelet model, and we introduced the Time in Reference Region of Variability (TIRRV) to assess individual changes relative to baseline.

resultsThe analysis of wearable physical activity data poses an important challenge for traditional statistical methods, which often fail to account for dependency between sequential data points and varying characteristics. In this work we demonstrate the effectiveness of a Trend Locally Stationary Wavelet model (TLSW) approach in analysing hourly resolution data from a 12-week intervention, enhancing the understanding of physical activity data, and providing meaningful insights at both individual and group levels. The TLSW considers the time dependency and structure of the data, enabling detailed trend and point-wise confidence intervals analysis. In addition to trends, the newly-developed TIRRV represents a baseline-informed metric to assess the success of individuals and groups over time. The application of these methods produce robust and readily understandable insights about the effect of interventions.

conclusionsThe TLSW-based approach is a novel method for analysing physical activity collected using high-resolution wearable technology. The TLSW trends robustly characterize individual and group behaviour over extended periods of time. This novel approach enables researchers, clinicians, and patients to understand temporal changes in device-measured physical activity data in a way that was not possible previously.

Indexed as

ExerciseWearable Electronic DevicesAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsWavelet AnalysisNon-stationary time seriesPhysical activity data analysisTrend estimationWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID40598494
PMCPMC12220009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.