ArticleTrials2025
Statistical and health economic analysis plan for a secure care hospital evaluation of manualised (interpersonal) art-psychotherapy: the SCHEMA randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe SCHEMA trial evaluates whether interpersonal art psychotherapy reduces the frequency/severity of aggressive incidents or patient distress associated with psychiatric symptoms, compared to usual care.
objectiveTo describe the statistical and health economic analysis plan.
methodsA multicentre, two-arm, parallel-group, single blind individually randomised controlled trial with 150 adults within NHS secure care who have borderline to mild/moderate intellectual disability. The primary outcome is the frequency/severity of aggressive behaviour, measured on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) 19 weeks post-randomisation, analysed using a linear mixed-effect model, adjusted for baseline MOAS and stratification by gender and psychosis diagnosis. Changes in aggressive behaviour will be evaluated using weekly MOAS scores between 19 and 38 weeks. Patient distress relating to psychiatric symptoms will be assessed using the Brief Symptom Inventory Positive Symptom Distress Index across baseline, 19, and 38 weeks. Health-related quality-of-life will be assessed using self- and proxy-reported EQ-5D three-level (EQ-5D-3L) and Recovering Quality of Life 10-item measures, the latter to estimate the ReQoL Utility Index, across baseline, 19, and 38 weeks. The self-reported EQ-5D-3L is collected using an adapted version for people with intellectual disabilities. Resource-use is collected based on secure care records, to estimate intervention and healthcare costs over 19 and 38 weeks. HRQoL and cost data will inform cost-effectiveness based on the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year over 38 weeks. DISCUSSION: This paper details the planned analyses and discusses recruitment challenges, sample size implications, and effect size assumptions. The plan was developed prior to database lock and unblinding to minimise analytical bias.
trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN57406593 . Registered on 18/01/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.