Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598460›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2025

Multisensory BCI promotes motor recovery via high-order network-mediated interhemispheric integration in chronic stroke.

Rongrong Lu, Zhen Pang, Tianhao Gao, Zhijie He, Yiqian Hu, Jie Zhuang, Qin Zhang, Zhengrun Gao

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. [A review of noninvasive brain-computer interfaces combined with transcranial electrical stimulation for neural rehabilitation].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rongrong Lu *Department of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Zhen Pang *Department of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Tianhao GaoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Zhijie HeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Yiqian HuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Shanghai Geriatric Medical Center, No. 2560 Chunshen Road, Shanghai, 200237, China.
Jie ZhuangSchool of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Qin ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Shanghai, 200040, China.
Zhengrun GaoDepartment of Neurology, Songjiang Research Institute, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Emotions and Affective Disorders, Songjiang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 201600, China. zrgao@shsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Medical Innovation Research Project funded by Shanghai Science and Technology Commission 23Y11900900Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 20234Y0043Shanghai Natural Science Foundation 22ZR1479000the National Science Foundation of China 82271422the National Science Foundation of China 82372570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic stroke patients often experience persistent motor impairments, and current rehabilitation therapies rarely achieve substantial functional recovery. Sensory feedback during movement plays a pivotal role in driving neuroplasticity. This study introduces a novel multi-modal sensory feedback brain-computer interface (Multi-FDBK-BCI) system that integrates proprioceptive, tactile, and visual stimuli into motor imagery-based training. We aimed to explore the potential therapeutic efficacy and elucidate its neural mechanisms underlying motor recovery.

methodsThirty-nine chronic stroke patients were randomized to either the Multi-FDBK-BCI group (n = 20) or the conventional motor imagery therapy group (n = 19). Motor recovery was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (primary outcome), Motor Status Scale, Action Research Arm Test, and surface electromyography. Functional MRI was used to examine brain activation patterns during upper limb tasks, while Granger causality analysis and machine learning evaluated inter-regional connectivity changes and their predictive value for recovery.

resultsMulti-FDBK-BCI training led to significantly greater motor recovery compared to conventional therapy. Functional MRI revealed enhanced activation of high-order transmodal networks-including the default mode, dorsal/ventral attention, and frontoparietal networks-during paralyzed limb movement, with activation strength positively correlated with motor improvement. Granger causality analysis identified a distinct information flow pattern: signals from the lesioned motor cortex were relayed through transmodal networks to the intact motor cortex, promoting interhemispheric communication. These functional connectivity changes not only supported motor recovery but also served as robust predictors of therapeutic outcomes.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the Multi-FDBK-BCI system as a promising strategy for chronic stroke rehabilitation, leveraging activity-dependent neuroplasticity within high-order transmodal networks. This multi-modal approach holds significant potential for patients with limited recovery options and sheds new light on the neural drivers of motor restoration, warranting further investigation in clinical neurorehabilitation.

trial registrationAll data used in the present study were obtained from a research trial registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov database (ChiCTR-ONC-17010739, registered 26 February 2017, starting from 10 January 2017).

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesFeedback, SensoryRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuronal PlasticityBrain-computer interfaceBrain pasticityHemiplegiaMulti-modal sensory feedbackStroke

Identifiers

PMID40598460
PMCPMC12220625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.