ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2025
Effect of a workshop for questionnaire-based surveys on research awareness and motivation among community and hospital pharmacists in Mie Prefecture.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comparative study of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based and text-based training in sterile preparation: pilot trial of early-stage clinical VR study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough questionnaire-based surveys enable pharmacists to systematically assess patient needs, healthcare practices, and medication outcomes, it is essential to minimize various biases to ensure that the data obtained from surveys are both reliable and valid. The present study aimed to elucidate whether a workshop on questionnaire-based surveys could enhance research awareness and motivation among community and hospital pharmacists in Mie prefecture.
methodsThe workshop comprised three parts: lecture (15 min), group work (90 min), and presentation (60 min). The participants' awareness and motivation for questionnaire-based survey was assessed through a questionnaire before and after the workshop, focusing on three questions. A customer satisfaction analysis was also conducted to identify areas for improvement in workshops on questionnaire-based surveys for future workshops.
resultsResponse rate of the questionnaire was 100% (16/16 participants). In the question 1 "I think that it would be beneficial to conduct a questionnaire-based survey on daily tasks and present the findings at conferences or publish them in academic journals", no respondents answered "Disagree" when asked after workshop. In the question 2 "I would like to conduct a questionnaire-based survey if there is a specific theme", the proportions of respondents selecting "Neutral" (p = 0.027) and "Somewhat disagree" (p = 0.001) also decreased after workshop, and all participants responded with either "Agree" or "Somewhat agree." In the question 3 "I think that I can independently design a research project about questionnaire-based survey.", the proportion of respondents who selected "Agree" significantly increased from 6.3% before-workshop to 25% after-workshop (p = 0.003). The customer satisfaction graph revealed that only "Understanding of the lecture" was located in the priority maintenance area. On the other hand, "Time allocation of the presentation" and "Usefulness of the mentor" were located in the priority improvement area.
conclusionThe present study revealed that a workshop for questionnaire-based surveys enhanced research awareness and motivation among community and hospital pharmacists. Increasing the time allocated for discussions among participants was suggested to enhance participant satisfaction and potentially influence their understanding and skills in questionnaire-based surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.