ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of community-based rehabilitation service delivery for severe mental illness using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR): a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-based rehabilitation (CBR) services are crucial for improving the prognosis of people with severe mental illness (SMI) in China and other developing countries. However, these services face limitations and a lack of stakeholders’ insights. This study examines the barriers and facilitators to implementing CBR services for people with SMI in China to inform future improvements.
methodsThis study employed a descriptive qualitative design guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 stakeholders (16 mental health practitioners, 11 people with SMI, and 5 family caregivers) to explore their perceptions of factors influencing the implementation of CBR services for people with SMI. The interview data were analyzed and reported using the updated CFIR, with MAXQDA 2022 software facilitating the analysis process.
resultsWithin the CFIR, the following key constructs were identified as critical to CBR services implementation for people with SMI: (1) innovation—considering the evidence base, complexity, and cost of the intervention; (2) outer setting—encompassing critical incidents, local attitudes and conditions, partnerships and connections, policies and laws, financing, and external Pressure; (3) inner setting—reflecting structural characteristics, relational connections, communications, and culture; (4) individuals—encompassing both innovation deliverers and recipients; (5) process—focusing on assessing needs and engaging stakeholders.
conclusionsImplementing sustainable and effective CBR services for people with SMI in China and similar settings requires early stakeholder involvement and attention to several key factors. These include a robust evidence base, readily accessible and standardized CBR services, enhanced training and team development for service providers, precise service needs assessment, active community engagement, and sustained policy and financial support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.