ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
A comparative study of four cell-free DNA assays for detecting circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methylated ARHGAP40 in renal cell carcinoma associated with tumor necrosis and grade: a potential biomarker for non-invasive early detection.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Normalization of CEA, CA15-3, and CA27-29 Tumor Markers Following Single Lung Transplant in a Patient With a History of Early-Stage Breast Cancer and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Case Report.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in neoadjuvant therapy for solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early prediction of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) enables tailoring treatment strategies to the specific needs of individual breast cancer patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has shown to be a prognostic factor for response on NAC during treatment. However, at this point in time mostly tumor-informed ctDNA detection methods are used which are costly, have relatively long turnaround times and are subsequently potentially less feasible for widespread clinical application. In this study, we investigated four tumor-agnostic methods to determine their ability to accurately detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at baseline. These methods were the Oncomine Breast cell free DNA (cfDNA) NGS panel, the LINE-1 sequencing assay mFAST-SeqS, shallow whole genome sequencing and the genome-wide methylation profiling assay MeD-Seq. In total 40 patients with triple negative or luminal B breast cancer were included and cell free DNA (cfDNA) from plasma before the start of NAC was analyzed with the four assays. We detected ctDNA in 3/24 (12.5%) patients with Oncomine, 5/40 (12.5%) with mFast-SeqS, 3/40 (7.7%) with low pass shallow WGS and 23/40 with MeD-Seq (57.5%). When all methods were combined ctDNA was detected in 65% of patients. In conclusion, we demonstrated that tumor agnostic methods, in particular MeD-Seq, can detect ctDNA in a fraction of the patients with early breast cancer, but further optimization is needed to reach the potential currently demonstrated by tumor-informed methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.