Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598385›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2025

African abattoirs: a scoping review of practices, factors influencing implementation of good practices, and recommended solutions for improvement.

Askale Gizaw Nigussie, Fiona Vande Velde, Edilu Jorga Sarba, Bersissa Kumsa, Sarah Gabriel

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drivers of zoonoticOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Askale Gizaw NigussieDepartment of Veterinary Laboratory Technology, Ambo University, P.O. box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia. askalegizaw21@gmail.com.
Fiona Vande VeldeDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology, and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke, 9820, Belgium.
Edilu Jorga SarbaDepartment of Veterinary Science, Ambo University, P.O. box 19, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Bersissa KumsaDepartment of Pathology and Parasitology, Addis Ababa University, P.O. box 34, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Sarah GabrielDepartment of Translational Physiology, Infectiology, and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, Merelbeke, 9820, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Africa, ongoing challenges posed by zoonotic foodborne diseases highlight the need to improve control practices. This review aims to present a structured overview by summarizing documented practices in African abattoirs, factors influencing the implementation of either poor or good practices, and the recommended solutions to enhance good practices.

methodsThis scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, and the Population-Concept-Context framework. To identify relevant articles, searches were conducted across the Scopus, PubMed, PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases, along with additional records from African Journal Online, Google, and Google Scholar.

resultsOut of 1,547 identified articles, 91 that met the eligibility criteria were included in the final analysis. These studies were conducted in 12 African countries, including Nigeria, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Sudan, Cameroon, Morocco, South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, Egypt, and Sierra Leone. The review identified several poor meat-processing practices, such as a lack of inspections, unhygienic processing, inadequate cleaning, improper meat storage, and poor waste disposal. On the other hand, the current scoping review identified good practices, such as documenting and reporting inspection findings, waste treatment, waste reuse, timely meat delivery, and the reversal of these poor practices. Barriers to good practices were weak policies, lack of basic infrastructure and facilities, insufficient funds, absence of supervision, poor enforcement, poor information flow, lack of knowledge, and inadequate training. Good practices were facilitated by factors like available policy, the establishment and use of critical control points, and basic infrastructure and facilities. Results of the present scoping review also demonstrate that recommended solutions for improvement include following guidelines, developing policies, better enforcement, providing basic infrastructure and facilities, providing training, collaboration, and adopting the One Health approach.

conclusionsThis scoping review identified a range of poor and good practices and factors that influence the implementation of such practices and recommended improvement solutions. Overcoming barriers and leveraging facilitators are essential for improvement and require collaboration among stakeholders. Furthermore, research is needed to validate the effectiveness of the recommended solutions.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAfricaAnimalsHumansMeatAbattoirAfricaBarriersFacilitatorsFoodborne diseasesPractices

Identifiers

PMID40598385
PMCPMC12219032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.