ArticleBMC health services research2025
Agile implementation for hypertension control in primary care.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting 48% of US adults, with nearly three quarters of them remaining uncontrolled. Despite evidence-based guidelines for the management of hypertension, gaps persist in their clinical application. The aim of this study was to improve blood pressure control rates among nonpregnant adult patients in primary care.
methodsWe applied the Agile Implementation process to address barriers to guideline implementation. Using an iterative quality improvement approach, we implemented the AI process in a clinic serving minority and underserved populations from January 2023 to December 2023.
resultsThe AI process increased hypertension control rates from 43 to 58%, using a target blood pressure below 140/90 mmHg.
conclusionsThe AI process effectively improved hypertension control rates in an underserved primary care setting, offering a scalable approach for enhancing outcomes in similar populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.