ArticleBMC medical education2025
Strategic implementation of child and adolescent psychiatry training in Chinese residency programs: an exploratory survey.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Satisfaction with Job Transfer Training Among Physicians Transitioning to Psychiatric Practice in Guangdong Province, China.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Sustaining Interest in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Through Mentorship and Training in China: Multi-site Survey Findings.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe workforce shortage in child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) in China greatly restricts patients' access to child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS). Implementing CAP training within general or adult psychiatry programs may offer a viable solution; however, such programs are underdeveloped in China. The aim of this study was to gather empirical evidence regarding CAP training needs within Chinese psychiatry residency programs.
methodAn exploratory survey was administered online to psychiatry residents and their mentors to assess the application of CAP in clinical practice, satisfaction with existing CAP training, and attitudes towards the expansion of such training. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, the Mann‒Whitney U test, the t-test, and the χ2 test to explore demographic differences and responses.
resultsA total of 230 residents (response rate = 54.76%) and 241 mentors (response rate = 53.79%) provided effective responses. A significant majority of both residents (201, 87.39%) and mentors (216, 89.63%) reported frequent engagements with pediatric mental health patients. Additionally, a considerable portion in both groups (70.43% of the residents and 59.34% of the mentors) indicated experiencing moderate to high stress levels in their work with these patients, primarily due to inadequate training in CAP. Only 37.39% of the residents and 21.99% of the mentors expressed satisfaction with current training offerings. Notably, substantial support exists among both residents (77.82%) and mentors (85.89%) for expanding CAP training programs.
conclusionsThis study highlights a critical gap in CAP expertise among psychiatry professionals in China, mirrored by general dissatisfaction with existing training frameworks. There is strong, evidence-based support for the expansion of CAP training within residency programs, which is imperative to bolster the competence of CAMHS providers. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.