Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598332›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Midwives' experiences with simulation-based team training in newborn resuscitation: impacts on clinical practice.

Liza Olsen-Bremmeng, Linda Wike Ljungblad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liza Olsen-BremmengDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Havnegata 5, Harstad, 9405, Norway.
Linda Wike LjungbladCentre for Women's, Family and Child Health, University of South-Eastern Norway (USN), Box 235, Kongsberg, N-3603, Norway. linda.w.ljungblad@usn.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidwives play a crucial role in newborn resuscitation as they are the primary caregivers during childbirth. Simulation training provides training experience to increase competence to handle such acute situations. However, team training provides safety for midwives, and good collaboration is vital for the patient safety of newborn babies in need of resuscitation.

aimThis study aimed to describe midwives' experiences with simulation-based team training in newborn resuscitation and explore its impact on clinical practice. Specifically, the study seeks to highlight how simulation-based team training can enhance teamwork, strengthen professional competencies, improve team communication, and positively influence patient outcomes in neonatal care.

methodsThe study employed a qualitative method with an explorative design. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted. The data was collected from October to November 2023 with ten midwives working in maternity wards in Norway. The data was analysed using systematic text condensation.

resultsThe analysis revealed three main findings: (1) Psychological safety in a familiar team, (2) Learning and improvement and (3) Clear communication.

conclusionOur study highlights the critical importance of fostering psychological safety within familiar teams, emphasising how emotional security contributes to effective learning and professional growth. The findings demonstrate that recognising emotional safety leads to more positive learning experiences, fostering competence and confidence in clinical practice. Furthermore, clear communication is identified as essential for collaboration, ensuring beneficial experience in simulation and team training related to newborn resuscitation. By strengthening team communication and psychological security, simulation training not only enhances theoretical understanding but also directly impacts clinical decision-making, patient outcomes, and team dynamics in acute newborn resuscitation scenarios. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

ExperienceMidwifeQualitative methodSimulationSystematic text condensationTeam training

Identifiers

PMID40598332
PMCPMC12211898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.