ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Medical management and differential diagnosis of restrictive eating disorders in men: a case study report with co-produced recommendations.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collective responsibility and ecological thinking in eating disorders: moving beyond individualistic models of illness and recovery.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Do new labels solve old problems? Conceptual, ethical, and clinical challenges of constructing restrictive eating behaviours as "self-harm".Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Associations Among Anxiety, Sleep Quality, and Binge Eating in Hispanic and African American/Black Early Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Conceptualising trauma in eating disorders: a reflexive commentary on the role of neglect, iatrogenic harm, and epistemic injury.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal dysfunction after brain injury: Mechanisms and the role of the brain-gut axis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMales with eating disorders (EDs) are an underrepresented population whose symptomatology and treatment needs are poorly understood, having been overlooked in clinical research to date. The role of gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastroparesis, in the context of restrictive EDs is similarly under-explored. Making use of emerging evidence regarding conditions that co-occur with severe EDs to consider potential differential diagnoses in cases of complex and uncertain symptomatology can assist in providing more individualised and empathetic care, preventing avoidable outcomes, including death. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a male patient with a longstanding history of restrictive eating and diagnosis of anorexia nervosa is presented. After hospital admission, they developed severe complications, including aspiration pneumonia. Despite medical interventions, the patient's complex presentation and the lack of individualised treatment options contributed to the tragic outcome of death. A postmortem diagnosis revealed gastroparesis, a condition that had gone undetected during his life. Prior to his death, the patient had presented with symptoms overlapping with Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and neurodivergence, which are worth considering for how they may have played a role in complicating the clinical picture and making diagnosis and treatment more challenging.
conclusionsThe case illustrates the value of exploring differential diagnoses when providing individualised and comprehensive treatment for ED patients with diverse symptomatology and identities. Even where diagnoses of co-occurring conditions do not apply, traditional research and knowledge from lived experience show how adopting an integrative stance is valuable for all patients. Specifically, there is an urgent need for improved treatment protocols for males with restrictive EDs, which accommodate co-occurring conditions like gastroparesis and possible differential diagnoses such as ARFID and neurodivergent conditions. Recommendations are given for how providers can implement gender-specific treatment, comprehensive assessments, and a multidisciplinary approach. Co-creating knowledge with patients themselves is central to achieving more empathetic, well-fitting, and effective treatment that appreciates the complexities of overlapping physical and psychological conditions, and ultimately reduces the risk of preventable deaths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.