Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598321›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Medical management and differential diagnosis of restrictive eating disorders in men: a case study report with co-produced recommendations.

James Downs, Clive Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James DownsPerson with Lived Experience, Independent Peer Researcher, Cardiff, Wales. jamesldowns@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-8574
Clive KellyJames Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMales with eating disorders (EDs) are an underrepresented population whose symptomatology and treatment needs are poorly understood, having been overlooked in clinical research to date. The role of gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastroparesis, in the context of restrictive EDs is similarly under-explored. Making use of emerging evidence regarding conditions that co-occur with severe EDs to consider potential differential diagnoses in cases of complex and uncertain symptomatology can assist in providing more individualised and empathetic care, preventing avoidable outcomes, including death. CASE PRESENTATION: The case of a male patient with a longstanding history of restrictive eating and diagnosis of anorexia nervosa is presented. After hospital admission, they developed severe complications, including aspiration pneumonia. Despite medical interventions, the patient's complex presentation and the lack of individualised treatment options contributed to the tragic outcome of death. A postmortem diagnosis revealed gastroparesis, a condition that had gone undetected during his life. Prior to his death, the patient had presented with symptoms overlapping with Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) and neurodivergence, which are worth considering for how they may have played a role in complicating the clinical picture and making diagnosis and treatment more challenging.

conclusionsThe case illustrates the value of exploring differential diagnoses when providing individualised and comprehensive treatment for ED patients with diverse symptomatology and identities. Even where diagnoses of co-occurring conditions do not apply, traditional research and knowledge from lived experience show how adopting an integrative stance is valuable for all patients. Specifically, there is an urgent need for improved treatment protocols for males with restrictive EDs, which accommodate co-occurring conditions like gastroparesis and possible differential diagnoses such as ARFID and neurodivergent conditions. Recommendations are given for how providers can implement gender-specific treatment, comprehensive assessments, and a multidisciplinary approach. Co-creating knowledge with patients themselves is central to achieving more empathetic, well-fitting, and effective treatment that appreciates the complexities of overlapping physical and psychological conditions, and ultimately reduces the risk of preventable deaths.

Indexed as

AnorexiaARFIDDiagnosisEating disordersEthicsGastroparesisIndividualised treatmentMalesMedical managementNeurodivergence

Identifiers

PMID40598321
PMCPMC12220133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.