ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
Human platelet lysate standardization across three independent European blood establishments.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Donation to Innovation: New Blood-Derived Products.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026Review
- Platelet Lysate-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Tissue Engineering: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Addition of human platelet lysate to islet culture medium suppresses islet loss and improves transplantation outcomes.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human platelet lysate (hPL) is a clinically safe alternative to fetal bovine serum (FBS). However, variability in blood donation practices, platelet concentrate preparation methods, storage and hPL manufacturing complicates standardization across jurisdictions. This study aimed to establish a first multinational hPL manufacturing standardization across three European blood centers to test feasibility and variability. A single batch of hPL production sets was distributed to the participating centers. There, hPL was produced following a single standard operating protocol but starting from each center's unique platelet concentrates. Each center prepared four 'national' hPL batches and four 'international' batches. Researchers conducted blinded quality and variation analyses to ensure unbiased results. All hPL batches exhibited comparable total protein levels, pH, ionic strength, and lactate content. Analysis of twelve growth factors showed minor variations across batches. Endothelial cell outgrowth and wound closure were slower in hPL than FBS but remained consistent across batches. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) doubling was significantly faster in hPL than in FBS, with MSC phenotype consistency confirmed via flow cytometry. Differentiation into adipogenic and osteogenic tissue was successful in all hPL samples. The inter-institutional variation across all national batches was higher for all critical outcome parameters compared to the variation in the four international batches. These findings confirm the feasibility of manufacturing standardized hPL across borders and show lower variability when doing so. This supports further efforts to stabilize hPL supply and advance cytotherapy standardization in Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.