Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598275›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2025

Differential effects of inulin and fructooligosaccharides on gut microbiota composition and glycemic metabolism in overweight/obese and healthy individuals: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Jie Li, Feitong Liu, Yuemei Luo, Anisha Wijeyesekera, Shan Wang, Xiaojiao Chen, Yamei Lv, Jing Jin, Huafang Sheng, Guopan Wang and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jie Li *Microbiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Feitong Liu *Microbiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yuemei Luo *Microbiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Anisha WijeyesekeraDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, School of Chemistry, Food and Pharmacy, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AP, UK.
Shan WangFun-Poo Biotech, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Xiaojiao ChenMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yamei LvMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing JinMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Huafang ShengMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guopan WangQuantum Hi-Tech Biological Co., Ltd, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Yuanan WeiQuantum Hi-Tech Biological Co., Ltd, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China.
Zhuang LiMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. jiandandjx@126.com.
Muxuan ChenMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. muxuanchen@126.com.
Hongwei ZhouMicrobiome Medicine Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. hzhou@smu.edu.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M721505Guangzhou Key Research Program on Brain Science 202206060001National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFA0806400National Natural Science Foundation of China 82130068National Natural Science Foundation of China 82402687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModulating the gut microbiota with prebiotics is a promising strategy for managing metabolic diseases. However, the clinical effects on glycemic metabolism across different populations remain uncertain. In this study, we conducted a randomized, double-blind investigation to examine the impact of inulin and fructooligosaccharides (FOS) on glycemic metabolism in overweight/obese and healthy adults.

methodsA total of 131 adults were included, with 44 receiving inulin, 43 receiving FOS, and 44 receiving placebo over a period of 4 weeks. Blood and fecal samples were collected before and after the intervention, and various metabolic parameters, gut microbiota composition, and metabolites were analyzed.

resultsPlacebo had no effect on glycemic metabolism or gut microbiota. Inulin significantly reduced glucose levels at 1 h (Cohen's d = 0.71, p = 0.041) and 2 h (Cohen's d = 0.73, p = 0.028) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), increased fasting insulin (Cohen's d = 0.70, p = 0.008), and lowered homocysteine (HCY) levels (Cohen's d = 0.76, p = 0.014) in overweight/obese individuals. These effects were not observed in healthy individuals. In contrast, although FOS significantly decreased HCY (Cohen's d = 0.72, p = 0.023), it did not improve glycemic metrics in either group. Inulin also reduced the abundance of Ruminococcus by 72.0% (from 1.661% ± 1.501% to 0.465% ± 0.594%), positively correlating with improved glycemic outcomes. Propionate levels decreased significantly in both overweight/obese (Cohen's d = 0.89, p = 0.014) and healthy participants (Cohen's d = 1.19, p = 0.020) following inulin. Functional prediction of gut microbiota revealed upregulation of microbial folate and glutathione metabolism with inulin, and purine metabolism with FOS.

conclusionsPractically, inulin may be more suitable for managing glycemic dysregulation in overweight or obese individuals, while FOS may be considered for HCY reduction in individuals with normal glycemic status. Such targeted use of prebiotics could complement existing dietary and pharmacologic strategies in personalized metabolic care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IOR-17010574.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseGastrointestinal MicrobiomeInulinObesityOligosaccharidesOverweightAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrebioticsBlood GlucosefructooligosaccharideInulinOligosaccharidesPrebioticsFructo-oligosaccharides (FOS)Glycemic metabolismGut microbiotaInulin (INU)Overweight/obesePrebioticsRCT

Identifiers

PMID40598275
PMCPMC12219383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.