ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Implicit bias in ICU electronic health record data: measurement frequencies and missing data rates of clinical variables.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable machine learning model for early pediatric sepsis prediction using cytokine and routine laboratory data.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- TRIAGE: Trustworthy Reporting and Assessment for Clinical Gain and Effectiveness of AI Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Discovery of data quality issues in electronic health records: profound consequences for critical care medicine applications - a systematized review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystematic disparities in data collection within electronic health records (EHRs), defined as non-random patterns in the measurement and recording of clinical variables across demographic groups, can be reflective of underlying implicit bias and may affect patient outcome. Identifying and mitigating these biases is critical for ensuring equitable healthcare. This study aims to develop an analytical framework for measurement patterns, defined as the combination of measurement frequency (how often variables are collected) and missing data rates (the frequency of missing recordings), evaluate the association between them and demographic factors, and assess their impact on in-hospital mortality prediction.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database, which includes data on over 40,000 ICU patients from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (2001-2012). Adult patients with ICU stays longer than 24 h were included. Measurement patterns, including missing data rates and measurement frequencies, were derived from EHR data and analyzed. Targeted Machine Learning (TML) methods were used to assess potential systematic disparities in measurement patterns across demographic factors (age, gender, race/ethnicity) while controlling for confounders such as other demographics and disease severity. The predictive power of measurement patterns on in-hospital mortality was evaluated.
resultsAmong 23,426 patients, significant demographic systematic disparities were observed in the first 24 h of ICU stays. Elderly patients (≥ 65 years) had more frequent temperature measurements compared to younger patients, while males had slightly fewer missing temperature measurements than females. Racial disparities were notable: White patients had more frequent blood pressure and oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements compared to Black and Hispanic patients. Measurement patterns were associated with ICU mortality, with models based solely on these patterns achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.77).
conclusionsThis study underscores the significance of measurement patterns in ICU EHR data, which are associated with patient demographics and ICU mortality. Analyzing patterns of missing data and measurement frequencies provides valuable insights into patient monitoring practices and potential systemic disparities in healthcare delivery. Understanding these disparities is critical for improving the fairness of healthcare delivery and developing more accurate predictive models in critical care settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.