ArticleBMC medical education2025
Addressing the challenges of field notes in medical education: a qualitative study of resident experiences.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluating resident physicians' competencies is critical in medical education to ensure high standards of patient care and professional development. Field notes are increasingly used as reflective tools in postgraduate medical education. Despite their growing use, skepticism about their effectiveness persists. This study aims to identify challenges with learner engagement in field notes and gather suggestions for operational improvements.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted in the Department of Family & Community Medicine at the University of Toronto. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven postgraduate year one and year two family medicine residents. The interviews focused on residents' experiences and challenges with field notes. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis to develop a comprehensive codebook, in alignment with Braun and Clarke's framework.
resultsSeveral key challenges with the use of field notes were identified including the redundancy of feedback, sporadic utilization, and time constraints for preceptors. Residents also expressed uncertainty about the expectations for using the tool and identified it as complex and cumbersome. Operational suggestions for improvement included the development of a mobile-friendly platform, streamlined functionality, a standardized and integrated feedback system, and clearer guidelines for use.
conclusionsThe study highlighted significant challenges in the use of field notes within family medicine training programs and underscored the need for technological and procedural innovations to improve their effectiveness. Addressing these challenges through user-friendly design, clear guidelines, and integrated support systems could transform field notes into a more robust tool for competency-based medical education, benefiting residents, preceptors, and the broader medical community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.