ArticleBMC medical education2025
The cognitive and psychosocial effects of online learning in medical students during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study from Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-cultural determinants of AI acceptance in medical education among medical students in China and Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a swift shift towards e-learning platforms in medical education. While research has predominantly concentrated on evaluating the efficacy and obstacles associated with online learning, the cognitive and psychosocial dimensions within medical education remain largely underexplored.
methodsA mixed-methods explanatory sequential study was conducted from July 2021 to February 2022 amongst medical students engaged in online learning for at least six months in Karachi, Pakistan. In this study, participating medical students were requested to reflect on their experiences with and perceptions of online learning during and after the pandemic. The quantitative phase of the study involved a digital questionnaire, while the qualitative phase of the study employed semi-structured focus group discussions (FGDs). Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics and categorical associations were statistically tested using Pearson's chi-squared (𝜒
resultsA total of 262 students were included in the quantitative arm of the study (of whom 18 were included in the qualitative arm). 46.9% of the students were males, 51.1% were pre-clinical students, and 13.4% belonged to universities aside from Aga Khan University. Participating students reported that their academic screen time rose dramatically during the COVID-19 pandemic, with 80.5% spending over 3 h on screens, compared to 52.3% engaging for less than 1 h pre-pandemic. Online learning showed significant gender-based impacts: male students felt less engaged (p = 0.007), while female students reported less motivation (p = 0.007) and anxiety reduction (p = 0.042). Duration of online exposure influenced outcomes; students with less screen time for learning reported better self-regulation (p = 0.019), whereas higher entertainment screen time correlated with poorer achievement of learning objectives (p = 0.019). Pre-clinical students reported that they faced more challenges with engagement (p = 0.038), but were less likely to feel exhausted (p = 0.001) or have trouble paying attention during online studies than their clinical counterparts (p = 0.007). Overall, while some students highlighted the efficiency and convenience of online learning, many observed that they experienced increased distraction and isolation, suggesting a mixed impact on educational outcomes.
conclusionOnline medical education offers opportunities and challenges, with our results suggesting clear cognitive and psychosocial effects. Balancing student needs with hybrid learning methods is necessary to implement online learning pedagogies effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.