ArticleBMC medicine2025
Policy implementation and recommendations to address the double burden of malnutrition in South Africa: expert assessment using the expanded Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation and prioritization of food environment policies in Türkiye using the Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI).BMC public health · 2026Article
- Assessment of China's food and nutrition policies based on healthy food environment policy index (food-EPI): focusing on governance, funding and resources, platforms for interaction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSouth Africa faces a double burden of malnutrition (DBM), the coexistence and interaction of multiple forms of malnutrition (undernutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, and overweight/obesity) within individuals and households and across the life course. A healthy food environment is necessary to reduce this DBM. The Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI) can be used to evaluate the implementation of public nutrition and food environment policies in comparison with international best practices. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of implementation of healthy food environment policies in South Africa using an expanded DBM Food-EPI framework, benchmark policies against international best practices, develop priority policy recommendations, and compare implementation progress since the 2016 South African Food-EPI assessment.
methodsFrom October 2023 to March 2024, a panel of 23 national experts from different tiers of government (Department of Health), academia, and civil society was invited to participate in the Food-EPI assessment. Through two workshops and online feedback, experts evaluated the implementation of food environment policies across 60 indicators, compared these policies to international best practices, and proposed and prioritized a list of policy actions based on perceived implementation gaps.
resultsOf the 23 invited experts, 13 participated in the benchmarking workshop in which about 70% of indicators were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. Overall, of the 48 original indicators, the mean level of implementation improved from 2016 to 2024. Of the 12 indicators that addressed the DBM, eight were rated at very low to low levels of implementation. The experts (original panel plus four additional participants) then proposed ten priority actions, mainly across the domains of Food Promotion, Food Prices, Funding, and Platforms for Interaction.
conclusionsApplication of the expanded Food-EPI in South Africa showed improvements for the original indicators compared with 2016 and highlights the need for additional policy efforts to improve public nutrition policy and address the DBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.