Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598173›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Medical named entity recognition based on domain knowledge and position encoding.

Shuifa Sun, Qin Hu, Fengjiao Xu, Feng Hu, Yirong Wu, Ben Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuifa SunSchool of Information Science and Technology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Qin HuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Fengjiao XuCollege of Computer and Information Technology, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Feng HuSchool of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yirong WuInstitute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China.
Ben WangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China. 20170056@hznu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A model for recognizing named entities in Chinese electronic medical records is proposed, focusing on accurate boundary detection, by leveraging medical domain knowledge and positional encoding. Medical domain-specific terms are integrated into a BERT module by a lexical adapter firstly. After pre-training, the model captures the dynamic character feature representation containing lexical information and boundary information. In the feature encoding module, Star-Transformer and BiLSTM are employed to extract local features and long-distance features respectively in order to generate the sequence's feature representation. Additionally, considering the influence of the relative position information between characters in the text on recognition results, Rotary Position Embedding (RoPE) is incorporated to improve Star-Transformer to enhance the ability of extracting semantic features. Experimental results on the CCKS2020 dataset show an improvement in the F1-score, reaching 85.78%. Compared to the baseline model, the F1-score increases by 2.96%. For the self-build breast cancer ultrasound report dataset, improvement is also observed, which proves the effectiveness and applicability of the model in medical field.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingChinaHumansSemanticsBERTMedical domain dictionaryNamed entity recognitionRoPEStar-Transformer

Identifiers

PMID40598173
PMCPMC12220262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.