ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessing junior doctors' preparedness in inpatient cardiac arrest management: a cross-sectional study at a university hospital.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- UK Foundation Programme training needs a national minimum standard for advanced life support.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Emergency Care Preparedness of Frontline Junior Doctors: A Training Needs Assessment in Ghana.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Knowledge and training willingness toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation among healthcare professionals in a tertiary rehabilitation hospital: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest is an emergency that requires immediate and effective intervention. Junior doctors, who are often the first responders, play an important role in the initial management of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). However, there are still concerns about their preparedness in managing this critical event. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and confidence level to manage IHCA among junior doctors in a tertiary university hospital. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study using a self-administered validated questionnaire covering demographics, knowledge, attitude, and confidence related to CPR over one year from August 2023 to December 2024 involving 115 junior doctors. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 29. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study population, and Spearman's correlation was used to assess the relationships between knowledge, attitude, and confidence scores.
resultsThe median age was 27 years (IQR 26,28) with 50 (43.5%) males and 65 (56.5%) females. Most had completed BLS training (N = 104, 90.4%) and nearly all(N = 110,95.7%) had prior CPR experience, with 56.5% having performed CPR within the past month. The median knowledge score was 77.77% (IQR 72.22%, 83.33%). Knowledge gaps were identified in airway adjunct use (22.6% correct) and bag-mask ventilation selection (36.5% correct). Attitudes toward CPR were generally positive, with 98.2% (N = 113) believing CPR could save lives. However, 40% (N = 46) expressed concern about unintentionally causing patient harm and legal implications when initiating CPR. Confidence was highest in basic CPR tasks: chest compressions (N = 112, 97.4%) and bag-mask ventilation (N = 108, 94.0%). However, lower confidence was noted for advanced skills such as defibrillation (N = 87, 75.7%) and drug administration (N = 91, 79.1%). A significant positive correlation was found between knowledge-attitude (ρ = 0.272, p = 0.003) and attitude-confidence (ρ = 0.552, p < 0.001). The knowledge-confidence correlation was weak and not statistically significant (ρ = 0.180, p = 0.054).
conclusionThe knowledge of CPR among junior doctors in HCTM was found to be adequate. However, concerns and insecurities in managing cardiac arrest were still observed. Additional training and simulations are recommended to address this issue. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.