SynthesisBMC palliative care2025
Using nudges with electronic health records systems to improve advance care planning: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Enhancing goals of care discussions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinician-directed behavioural nudges.Age and ageing · 2026Pooled it
- Socioeconomic Deprivation, Primary Care Physician Workload and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Across Italian Regions: An Ecological Spatial Analysis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From inferring preferences to enabling choice: potentials of digital tools to improve substitute decision-making.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of digital tools in promoting advance care planning: a systematic review protocol.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearchers are increasingly studying nudges as a theoretical approach to promote behavior change. With the advancement of technology, nudges with electronic health records (EHR) systems become a new way to encourage healthcare professionals to perform advance care planning (ACP). This review aims to summarize nudges with EHR interventions and assess their effects on ACP outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 2024. Studies were included if they employed nudges developed within the EHR environment in healthcare setting and reported at least one objective measure of ACP. Two reviewers screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. A narrative synthesis was conducted for the data.
resultsTen reports (nine studies), including 27,556 participants, met all of the inclusion criteria. Nudge interventions included both EHR-delivered nudges and non-EHR nudges. Using the MINDSPACE framework, the EHR-delivered nudges were categorized as priming (n = 10), salience/affect (n = 1), and default (n = 1). The non-EHR nudges were classified as priming (n = 5), salience/affect (n = 2), and norms and messenger (n = 1). Narrative synthesis showed consistently positive effects on ACP documentation, serious illness conversations documentation, prognosis communication, advance directive completion, and goals-of-care documentation. Most studies reported statistically significant improvements. In contrast, the effects of interventions on end-of-life outcomes were inconsistent and largely non-significant.
conclusionOverall, findings suggest that EHR-integrated nudge strategies may improve documentation and communication practices related to ACP in patients with serious illness. However, their impact on downstream clinical outcomes remains uncertain. Due to the limited number of studies and high heterogeneity, further research is needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.