ArticleBMC nursing2025
Simulation-based learning in postgraduate critical care and anaesthesia nursing: an interview study from postgraduate nurses' perspectives.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSimulation-based learning is used to educate students in anaesthetics and critical care. At the postgraduate level, the aim is to foster an understanding of the connection between theory and practice and prepare nurses for the clinical environment. In this context, we created a new wherein we integrated simulation-based learning with clinical learning activities e.g. before start of clinical practice, during and after end of clinical practice. The postgraduate nurses were educated and instructed by university teachers from the postgraduate program and clinical active tutors, critical care nurses and registered nurse anaesthetists from the simulation center. This study aimed to explore the experiences of postgraduate nurses with simulation-based learning and its impact on their overall learning outcomes.
methodThis is a descriptive qualitative interview study with a purposeful sample of postgraduate nurses with experience with simulation-based learning during clinical practice. The data were analysed using inductive and thematic analysis.
resultsWe identified two themes 'pros of simulation-based learning' and 'cons of simulation- based learning' describing opportunities and obstacles related to the postgraduate nurses' experience of simulation-based learning. 'Pros of simulation-based learning' included the subthemes 'learning through scenarios facilitates preparedness for clinical practice,' 'learning via reflection gives you time to think over your actions' and 'Learning from tutors is valuable and highly regarded 'Cons of simulation based learning' included the subthemes 'it is difficult to accept the simulation situation and environment, 'the design of the scenarios and technical conditions constitutes a barrier' and 'Unfamiliar groups interfere with learning.
conclusionThis study shows that simulation-based learning activities promoted postgraduate nurses learning especially later in the education. Competence required for critical care nurses and registered nurse anesthetists is situational and competence specific, theoretical background and clinical experience are therefore required to promote progression in learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.