Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598115›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Developing user-friendly ambulatory referrals: a quality improvement study in GI referral services at a large academic safety net hospital system.

Aaron Gerard Issac, Wendy Du, Alix Youngblood, Wilhelmina Prinssen, Kelly Carroll, Robert Geller, Palak Patel, Bhavin Adhyaru, Jason Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aaron Gerard IssacDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA. aaron.issac@utexas.edu.
Wendy DuDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA.
Alix YoungbloodDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 2015 Uppergate Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA.
Wilhelmina PrinssenGrady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Kelly CarrollGrady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert GellerDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Palak PatelGrady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bhavin AdhyaruDepartment of General Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine and Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jason BrownDivision of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine and Grady Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

This quality improvement project was funded by the Emory Department of Medicine, FAME (Fostering the Academic Mission in the Emory DOM) grant. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, more than a third of patients are referred to specialists each year; however, most of these referrals do not lead to completed appointments. At the Grady Health System (GHS), our large safety net hospital system, the initial gastroenterology (GI) referral process suffered from multiple inefficiencies, creating barriers to care. We aimed to improve GI referrals with both a triage and a direct-to-endoscopy program to relieve systemic barriers to GI care at GHS especially around colorectal cancer screening.

methodsGiven wait times for GI services and employee dissatisfaction with navigating patients through the referral process, a GI smart order set was built using the Epic electronic medical record. The process took 8 months and included automated anesthesia screening as well as periprocedural guidance on blood thinners. We measured time from placement of referral for screening colonoscopy to scheduling of the screening colonoscopy to assess improvement in wait times for GI services. KEY

resultsIn our pre-implementation survey, 60% of providers placed at least one urgent referral a month, and 55% of providers were either somewhat or very dissatisfied with the referral process. This led to the creation of multiple unofficial and only partially successful bypasses to expedite GI care. With the new GI smart order set, there was a 93% reduction over 12 months in the time from providers screening colonoscopy referral request to procedure scheduling from an average of 422 to 28 days. In addition, overall rates of colorectal cancer screening increased approximately 6% from 43.5 to 49% since the order set was implemented.

conclusionsThis novel outpatient GI referral smart order set addressed multiple barriers to care and created a novel triage mechanism as well as a direct-to-endoscopy referral stream. This model can be used to improve triaging and increase access to GI and other specialist services.

Indexed as

GastroenterologyQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationSafety-net ProvidersColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsHumansTriageWaiting ListsDirect access endoscopyElectronic medical recordElectronic referralsProgrammatic colon cancer screeningSafety net hospital

Identifiers

PMID40598115
PMCPMC12211490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.