ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessing research self-efficacy and attitudes among medical students: a quasi-experimental study evaluating the impact of a structured training program.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research preparedness and competence among Nigerian medical and dental students applying for a research fellowship.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Developing critical appraisal skills among undergraduate students by early research exposure: an interventional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExposure of medical students to research improves their scientific output and future involvement in research. This is particularly important for Africa, where, despite the high disease burden, the continent contributes only 2% of the global research output. An important approach to address this is early introduction of students to research. This study aims to assess the effects of a training organized by the Federation of African Medical Students' Associations, on self-efficacy and attitudes of medical students to research.
methodsA pre- and post-training cross-sectional survey of medical students who participated in the research training was conducted. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Data was collected using pre-tested self-administered questionnaires, and was descriptively analyzed. The Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory-12 scale was used to investigate self-efficacy, and the Attitudes Towards Research scale was used to assess attitudinal changes. Mann-Whitney U test, and Independent Samples t-test were used to compare pre- and post- intervention scores.
resultsA total of 223 students from eleven African countries who registered for the training were enrolled. However, 152 completed the intervention. Age range was 15-40, with peak age being 21-25. Male to female ratio was 1:1.1. Majority (67%) of the participants were from Nigeria, and in their fourth year (27%). The scores of all six self-efficacy factors increased after the intervention with statistical significance. These included designing and collecting (27.3% to 57.0% p < 0.001); reporting, interpreting, and presenting (28.4% to 60.3% p < 0.001); conceptualizing and collaborating (32.7% to 63.2% p < 0.001); planning (31.8% to 60.7% p < 0.001); funding (21.3% to 53.7% p < 0.001); protecting (33.6% to 65.7% p < 0.001). Positive attitudes towards research increased significantly after the intervention with a mean score of 74.6% to 81.0% (p = 0.001), while negative attitudes decreased (48.9% to 42.9% p = 0.003).
conclusionStructured research training improves the self-efficacy and attitudes of students towards research, and thus should be incorporated into curricula. There is a need for longitudinal studies to further establish the long-term effects of early exposure of medical students to research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.