Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598100›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Use of dignity therapy in palliative care: a comprehensive scoping review.

Romel Jonathan Velasco Yanez, Erilaine de Freitas Corpes, Judith Sixsmith, Ana Fátima Carvalho Fernandes, Priscila de Souza Aquino, Régia Christina Moura Barbosa Castro, Herla Maria Furtardo Jorge

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Romel Jonathan Velasco YanezDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Erilaine de Freitas CorpesDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Judith SixsmithSchool of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, 11 Airlie Pl, Dundee DD1 4HJ, Dundeee, Scotland, UK. j.sixsmith@dundee.ac.uk.
Ana Fátima Carvalho FernandesDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Priscila de Souza AquinoDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Régia Christina Moura Barbosa CastroDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Herla Maria Furtardo JorgeDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDignity Therapy is an innovative intervention designed to alleviate emotional suffering and address the distress associated with loss of dignity in individuals with advanced illness or at the end of life. Its use has steadily increased, and previous systematic reviews have synthesized evidence on its effectiveness in palliative care. However, there is no comprehensive synthesis that explores aspects of this intervention beyond commonly reported clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to identify and synthesize the available evidence on the use of Dignity Therapy in palliative care.

methodsThis comprehensive scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, and the final report was prepared in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MNWUJ ). From 2016 onward, systematic searches were conducted in 11 databases, including gray literature. Study selection was performed using RAYYAN software, and qualitative content analysis was used for data analysis.

resultsOf the 815 records identified, 82 articles with 11 Gy literature documents included. Most studies were published in 2023 (19.5%), originated from the United States (23.1%), used an experimental design (29.2%), and focused on oncology (58.5%). Nine key categories emerged from the analysis: feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and effectiveness; perceived health benefits; impact on family; adaptation to diverse contexts; use of technology; economic feasibility; professional profiles; and implementation in underrepresented populations.

conclusionsThe evidence suggests benefits across various dimensions of health, including among family members, pediatric and adolescent populations, and traditionally underrepresented groups, as well as its implementation in early stages of illness and posthumous delivery. The expansion of Dignity Therapy has also driven cultural and linguistic adaptations, the development of derivative tools, and its application in a range of clinical contexts, along with the involvement of a broader spectrum of professionals. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis to guide healthcare professionals on the current state of knowledge, while identifying key research gaps and new insights to inform future studies.

Indexed as

Dignity TherapyPalliative CareHumansDignityDignity therapyEnd-of-life carePalliative careScoping review

Identifiers

PMID40598100
PMCPMC12210638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.