ArticleBMC health services research2025
Digitising wound care: a cost-consequence analysis of the Wound Care Command Centre™ in Australia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multisite Implementation of a Digital Wound Model of Care: A Post-Implementation Multimethods Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Perspectives and Lessons Learned.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Digital Health Tools for Wound Management: A Scoping Review.International wound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic wounds pose considerable financial challenges for healthcare systems globally, with most cases requiring hospital care and extended lengths of stay, particularly due to delayed access to treatment. To address this, Sydney Local Health District (LHD) in Australia launched the Wound Care Command Centre™ in 2023, utilising a digital application for timely access to wound care and to reduce the burden on hospitals. This study evaluates the cost consequences of this Centre by comparing healthcare service use under this new model of care compared to service use under standard clinical practice after one year of operation to determine savings to the health system.
methodsAdmitted patient, non-admitted and emergency department patient records relating to chronic wounds between 2018 and 2024 were analysed to determine service use costs, number of chronic wound admissions, length of stay, non-admitted services and emergency department presentations. Regression was used to control for patient mix, and records from a neighbouring LHD utilising the standard clinical care model was used as a control for this study.
resultsWe estimated that with the Wound Care Command Centre™, in 2023 there were up to 97 chronic wound admissions prevented, 943 hospital days averted due to earlier discharges, 308 more non-admitted service events and 208 more emergency department presentations in Sydney LHD, compared to expected levels under standard clinical practice models. This was consistent with reduced prevalence of complex cellulitis admissions in Sydney LHD and partial shifting of care from admitted to outpatient settings. Reduced hospital admissions and earlier discharges were estimated to total between $3.2 M to $4.8 M and costs of non-admitted and emergency department services were estimated to total $264k. After accounting for $1.3 M operational costs for the Command Centre over 2023, net savings were between $1.7 M to $3.3 M.
conclusionsThe Wound Care Command Centre™ reduced hospital admissions by 97 individuals and shortened hospital length of stays by 1.1 day, resulting in savings up to $3.3 M for Sydney LHD. Additional benefits for patients included increased access to specialist advice through the and reduced face-to-face contact due to use of a digital platforms minimising unnecessary hospital visits for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.