Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598093›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

A mixed methods pilot study of an internal coaching program within an academic emergency department.

Justin G Myers, Daniel Markwalter, Julianne M Cyr, Nikki Binz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin G MyersDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Daniel MarkwalterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Julianne M CyrDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nikki BinzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. nbinz@med.unc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 60% of emergency medicine physicians experience burnout. Professional coaching of physicians may reduce emotional exhaustion and burnout, while improving quality of life and resilience; however, few studies have specifically investigated coaching's impact on job satisfaction and burnout of emergency physicians. This study assesses the effects of a novel coaching program, which utilized internal professional coaches, on burnout and job satisfaction among emergency physicians in an academic emergency department.

methodsIn January 2022, an internal coaching program commenced for upper-level residents, fellows, and new faculty physicians. Participants engaged in individual coaching sessions, and group coaching sessions (n = 4) were offered to the entire department on a variety of topics (e.g., Leadership, Bedside Teaching). Quantitative data were collected to measure baseline and follow-up burnout and job satisfaction scores via the 2-Question Summative Score of Maslach Burnout Inventory [MBI] and Global Job Satisfaction [GJS] scales, respectively. Qualitative data gathered through surveys were inductively coded, leading to the identification of experiential themes.

resultsThirty-two participants enrolled in individual coaching. Eighty-nine individual coaching sessions were delivered, totaling 69.34 h. Participants received a median of 2 (range:1-6) sessions. Department-wide baseline and follow-up survey response rates were 33.7% and 32.7%, respectively. Among all respondents, burnout symptoms did not change significantly (MBI: t(55) = 2.00, p = 0.15), but job satisfaction declined significantly, with mean GJS scores decreasing from 3.73 (SD = 0.70, 95% CI: 3.49-3.98) to 3.15 (SD = 0.91, 95% CI: 2.82-3.47). When analyzed by coaching participation, no significant differences were found in MBI (t(12) = 2.18, p = 0.71) or GJS (t(10) = 2.23, p = 0.75) scores between participants and non-participants. Thematic analysis highlighted benefits and challenges of the internal coaching program. Identified themes reinforced coaching best practices (e.g., solutions-focused sessions), provided context for future efforts (e.g., maintaining diverse perspectives), and highlighted advantages and disadvantages of internal coaches (e.g., familiarity versus privacy).

conclusionOur pilot study did not demonstrate a reduction in burnout or an increase in job satisfaction. However, internal coaching offers valuable opportunities for academic emergency departments, including unique benefits and challenges. Future research should explore system-level impacts on burnout and job satisfaction during coaching program implementation as well as cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalMentoringPhysiciansAcademic Medical CentersAdultFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesAcademic medicineBurnoutCoachingEmergency medicineEmergency physicianJob satisfactionProfessional developmentWellness

Identifiers

PMID40598093
PMCPMC12211807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.