ArticleBMC medical education2025
Key disparities between first-generation and continuing-generation medical students: a quantitative analysis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFirst-Generation (FG) medical students face significant challenges that can hinder their academic success and well-being. Our study aimed to quantify the disparities between FG and Continuing-Generation (CG) students across four domains including: resilience, social isolation, unmet basic needs, and perception of institutional support.
methodsAn anonymous survey was administered to all four classes of medical students at Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine. Students had four weeks to complete the voluntary, 30-question survey which included 29 close-ended questions and one open-ended question to assess challenges in each domain. Survey data were collected in Qualtrics and analyzed using R Epi for R 4.4.1 GUI 1.80 Big Sur Intel build (8416). Primary analysis was performed using Students T-test to evaluate difference in means between cohorts, and one-way ANOVA was used in secondary analysis to correct for confounders between student attitudes across year in school. FG status was defined as having no parent with a 4-year college degree. Seventy-two students responded, and 62 completed surveys were included in the analysis.
resultsAmong the 62 respondents (15 FG, 47 CG), FG status predicted increased resilience (p = 0.01), feelings of social isolation (p = 0.005), and unmet basic needs (p < 0.001). Key disparities included food/housing insecurity, affordability of educational resources, and access to visiting student learning opportunities. There were no significant differences in resilience (p = 0.656), social isolation (p = 0.656), basic needs (p = 0.07), or perception of institutional support, (p = 0.651) based on year of training. The findings highlight FG students' financial strain, disconnection from peers, and desire for targeted support. Institutional scholarships received by 47% of FG and 53% of CG students (χ2 = 8.4e-31, p = 1.0) mitigated but did not eliminate these disparities.
conclusionOur data reveal substantial, ongoing challenges faced by FG medical students and support the previous findings identified by Havemann et al. We suggest that by enhancing healthcare access, grants for educational expenses, subsidized study materials, and fostering peer networks, medical schools can proactively address these gaps in medical student success to build a physician workforce equipped to serve all patients and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.