ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2025
Persian version of diabetes burnout scale among patients with type 2 diabetes: a validation study.
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDiabetes burnout is one of the problems of patients living with diabetes that has not been addressed enough. This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the psychometric properties of the diabetes burnout scale (DBS) among type 2 diabetes patients in Iran.
methodsThis methodological study was conducted among 1034 Iranian type 2 diabetes patients in 2023 in Mashhad (Iran). Cluster sampling method was used for selecting patients. Validity of Persian version of DBS was assessed by face, content, and construct validity. Cronbach α and McDonald's omega were used for evaluation the internal consistency and for evaluation the external reliability, test-retest reliability was used.
resultsIn EFA, three factors with eigenvalues above one were extracted and these factors explained 52% of variance of DBS. In EFA section, only 1 question moved from "Detachment" factor to "Exhaustion" factor. In CFA, goodness-of-fit indexes were appropriate (Some of goodness-of-fit indexes: RMSEA = 0.079, and IFI = 0.936) and the model of DBS was confirmed. Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega, and intraclass correlation coefficients for DBS were 0.827, 0.842, and 0.894 respectively. Finally, Persian version of DBS was approved with 12 items and three dimensions of Detachment with 4 items, Exhaustion with 5 items, and Loss of control with 3 items.
conclusionPersian version of DBS is a short and good instrument that can be used to check diabetes burnout status in Iranian patients living with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.