Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598057›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

'Unable to dodge the bullet': a qualitative study of ethical dilemmas and moral distress of critical care nurses during the Covid-19 pandemic in a South African Province.

Busisiwe Sibiya, Laetitia C Rispel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Busisiwe SibiyaCentre for Health Policy & South African Research Chairs Initiative, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. busisiweg.sibiya@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9717-9291
Laetitia C RispelCentre for Health Policy & South African Research Chairs Initiative, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-6331

Funding

Wellcome Trust 102219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, nurses have been at the frontline of the Covid-19 pandemic response and central to its effectiveness. They faced numerous ethical dilemmas which in turn resulted in considerable moral distress. However, there are knowledge gaps on the experiences of critical care nurses in South Africa during the pandemic.

aimExplore the experiences, specifically the ethical dilemmas and moral distress, of critical care nurses working in South African hospitals.

methodsGilligan's ethic of care theory informed this exploratory, qualitative descriptive study with nurses who had experience of taking care of individuals with Covid-19 and working in intensive (critical) care units in the Gauteng province of South Africa. We recruited eligible nurses through a combination of social media adverts, snowballing, and referral from professional associations or trade unions. Following voluntary informed consent, we conducted in-depth interviews with nurses using an interview guide that focused on personal and professional experiences during the pandemic, ethical dilemmas, relationships with other colleagues and/or management, and the availability of support systems. Data was analysed thematically.

resultsThe participants comprised 21 nurses, 16 females and 5 males with a mean age of 38 years. The majority were professional nurses (20/21 = 95%) and from the public health sector (17/21 = 81%). Nurses highlighted the tension between their deep caring for patients and the realities of taking care of patients during the Covid-19 pandemic that necessitated pragmatic compromises, such as doing the bare minimum. They expressed ambivalence about the Nursing Oath because they were acutely aware of the moral obligation to put the health of their patients as their first consideration, yet they faced the personal risk of infections and disease exposure. The uncertainty and fear of the pandemic, of infection, of the unknown, and of being in the frontline of health care provision resulted in considerable moral distress. Simultaneously, the perceived lack of appreciation for their work and for risking their lives as health care providers, and the resource constraints intersected with and exacerbated both ethical dilemmas and moral distress.

conclusionsThis study highlights the ethical dilemmas that nurses experienced during the pandemic, and their perceived moral distress. It contributes to the discourse on healthcare ethics, particularly in crisis situations, and highlights the need for robust support systems for nurses.

Indexed as

Covid-19Ethical dilemmasMoral distressNurses and critical/Intensive care

Identifiers

PMID40598057
PMCPMC12211416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.