ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Validation of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-9 and PHQ-2 in patients with COPD in China.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Capturing the late complications of venous thromboembolism.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Health outcomes, financial protection, and cost-effectiveness of community chronic disease management in China: a cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Fear of Missing Out and Its Association with Respiratory Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Who Use Short-Video Platforms.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Reward network mechanism in anhedonia and depression.PloS one · 2025Article
- Reliability and convergent validity of the PHQ-2 for the rapid detection of depressive symptoms in healthcare professionals in Argentina.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Albumin and psychological resilience: key modifiable factors for hospital length of stay in ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and PHQ-2 are commonly used screening tools for depression but have not been validated in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We aimed to validate PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 among COPD patients in China.
methodsStable COPD patients were assessed using a PHQ-9 questionnaire and then assessed by a senior psychiatrist to confirm the diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to validate the PHQ-9/PHQ-2.
resultsOut of 265 COPD patients, 11.7% were diagnosed with MDD. The Cronbach's α-coefficient for PHQ-9 was 0.751. Both PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 showed good correlations with COPD symptoms and quality of life. The AUC values of PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 were 0.848 and 0.736, respectively, for identifying MDD. Based on the highest Youden index, the optimal cut-off scores were PHQ-9 ≥ 7 and PHQ-2 ≥ 2, with a sensitivity of 74.2% and 58.1% and specificity of 89.7% and 89.3%, respectively.
conclusionPHQ-9 score ≥ 7 and PHQ-2 score ≥ 2 should be used as the optimal cut-offs for COPD patients in China. PHQ-9 is a valid tool for detecting MDD in COPD patients, while PHQ-2 (score < 2) is more useful for quickly excluding MDD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.