ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Development of an ensemble prediction model for acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic transplantation based on machine learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating the use of body mass index change as a proxy for anorexia nervosa recovery: a machine learning perspective.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major post-transplantation complication and one of the most significant causes of non-relapse-related death. However, the massive and complex clinical data make aGVHD difficult to predict. Machine learning (ML), a branch of artificial intelligence, has since been introduced in medicine due to its ability to process complex, high-dimensional variables quickly and capture nonlinear relationships. However, the effects of immunosuppressants exposure was not considered in previous ML models. Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop and optimize models by Cox regression and machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of aGVHD in which cyclosporin A exposure and common clinical factors were included as variables.
methodsThe data was preprocessed in the first step, and was randomly allocated at an 8:2 ratio. Cox regression model was constructed on the training set. Meanwhile, correlation analysis and recursive feature elimination were used for feature screening before machine learning model development. Then fifteen algorithms were used to establish models, and an ensemble model was established through soft voting based on the top five performance algorithms. Area under curve (AUC) was the main metric used to evaluate the model performance in the validation set, while nomogram and SHAP were applied to interpret the variables.
resultA total of 479 patients and 47 variables were included in the study. The incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 33.61%. The AUC of Cox regression model in the validation set was 0.625. In contrast, the new ensemble model has a better prediction ability (AUC = 0.776, Accuracy = 0.729, Precision = 0.667, Recall = 0.375, F1-score = 0.480). Except for the variables which were identified by previous studies, some rarely reported risk factors were found, such as quinolone, blood urea nitrogen and alkaline phosphatase.
conclusionsIn summary, a new ensemble model with promising accuracy was established to predict grade II-IV classic aGVHD in allo-HSCT patients. It will help identify high-risk patients at an early stage and thus reduce the incidence of aGVHD. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.