ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting depression in middle-aged and elderly cancer patients in China: a study based on the CHARLS cohort.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Illness Uncertainty in Patients with Malignant Tumors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models for Predicting Postoperative Depression Risk in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Electroencephalogram-guided anesthesia and postoperative anxiety and depression in elderly gastric cancer patients with sleep disorders.World journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Machine learning prediction models for visual impairment in Chinese adults aged ≥ 45 years with cardiovascular metabolic diseases: a population-based study using CHARLS.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression is very common in middle-aged and elderly cancer patients, which will seriously damage the quality of life and treatment effect of patients. This study aims to use machine learning methods to develop a predictive model to identify depression risk. However, since the traditional machine learning models have 'black box nature', Shapley Additive exPlanation is used to determine the key risk factors.
methodsThis study included 743 cancer patients aged 45 and above from the 2011-2020 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), and analyzed a total of 19 variables including demographic factors, economic factors, health factors, family factors, and personal factors. After screening the predictive features by LASSO regression, in order to determine the best model for prediction, six machine learning models-Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Multi-layer Perceptron, Decision Tree, XGBoost and Random Forest were trained.
resultsAfter training, the random forest model showed the best decision performance, AUC (95% CI): 0.774 (0.740-0.809). Subsequently, the model was interpreted by Shapley Additive exPlanation, and five key characteristics affecting the risk of depression were found. The feature importance plot intuitively shows that the predicted depression risk is significantly increased for patients with poor life satisfaction.
conclusionsWe developed a clinical visualization model for health care providers to estimate the risk of depression in middle-aged and elderly cancer patients. As a powerful tool for early identification of depressive symptoms in middle-aged and elderly cancer patients, this model enables medical workers to implement clinical interventions earlier to obtain better clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.