Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597966›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2025

Functional goals and outcomes of rehabilitation within palliative care: a multicentre prospective cohort study.

Matthew Maddocks, Lucy Fettes, Naomi Takemura, Joanne Bayly, Helena Talbot-Rice, Karen Turner, Rebecca Tiberini, Richard Harding, Fliss E M Murtagh, Richard J Siegert and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Individualized Physiotherapy Improves Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Advanced Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matthew MaddocksCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK. matthew.maddocks@kcl.ac.uk.
Lucy FettesCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Naomi TakemuraSchool of Nursing Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Joanne BaylyCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Helena Talbot-RiceSt Christopher's Hospice, 51-59 Lawrie Park Road, Sydenham, London, UK.
Karen TurnerRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, UK.
Rebecca TiberiniRebecca Tiberini Consultancy and Coaching, St Moritz, Switzerland.
Richard HardingCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Fliss E M MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Richard J SiegertDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Irene J HigginsonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephen A AshfordCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.
Lynne Turner-StokesCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research Senior InvestigatorNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South LondonThe Dunhill Medical Trust R423/0515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRehabilitation is an integral component of palliative care. An understanding of functional goals can help tailor interventions and support the evaluation of services. This study examined the nature and timescale of functional goals in palliative care, attainment of goals following personalised rehabilitation, responsiveness relative to health-related quality of life across, and factors associated with goal achievement.

methodsProspective, observational cohort study of adults with advanced progressive illness from 10 UK hospices referred for rehabilitation assessment. Urgency of care needs and functional status were assessed using the palliative Phase of Illness (stable, unstable, deteriorating) and Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS, ≥ 60,60 - 50, ≤ 40) respectively. Health-related quality of life was assessed using EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5 L) utility score. Functional goals were set collaboratively with patients using SMART goal statements, mapped onto the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) was used to evaluate achievement against an anticipated outcome using a T-score. Ordinal logistic regression was sued to identify factors associated with goal achievement.

results364 patients (54% female, mean (SD) age 68 (14) years, 71% cancer, 71% stable Phase, median AKPS 60) took part. They set a median (range) of 2 (1-4) goals; 645 in total. Goals had a median (range) timeframe of 28 (1-196) days and spanned 13/30 ICF domains; most frequently mobility, general tasks and demands, mental functions, community, social and civic life, and self-care. The majority focused on activity (51%) and participation (20%). Following personalised rehabilitation, GAS T-scores improved overall (mean (SD) change 8.9 (13.4)) and for each subgroup by Phase and AKPS (all p < 0.01). EQ-5D scores improved overall, but not for those with a deteriorating Phase or AKPS ≤ 40. Living alone or receiving multiple interventions increased the likelihood of goal achievement, whereas being wheelchair or bedbound, receiving a generic exercise intervention, or having goals rated as very difficult reduced it.

conclusionsFunctional goals in palliative care typically focus on optimising activity and participation in the short term. Progress towards personalised goals can be achieved through personalised rehabilitation, including among people with deteriorating health or largely confined to bed. Goal Attainment Scaling can help direct and evaluate rehabilitation interventions in this setting.

Indexed as

GoalsPalliative CareRehabilitationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeUnited KingdomEnd of lifeFunctioningGoalsPalliative careRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40597966
PMCPMC12210815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.