Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597962›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Machine learning algorithms predict breast cancer incidence risk: a data-driven retrospective study based on biochemical biomarkers.

Qianqian Guo, Peng Wu, Junhao He, Ge Zhang, Wu Zhou, Qianjun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qianqian Guo *State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome/Breast Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Peng Wu *The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Junhao HeSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ge ZhangLaw Sau Fai Institute for Advancing Translational Medicine in Bone and Joint Diseases (TMBJ), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Wu ZhouSchool of Medical Information Engineering, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. zhouwu@gzucm.edu.cn.
Qianjun ChenState Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome/Breast Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. cqj55@163.com.

Funding

Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Special Research Project on Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology YN2022QN01Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project NO.2024A03J0850National Natural Science Foundation of China 82274513, 82405608, and 82474504Planned Science Technology Project of Guangzhou SL2025A04J4201Project of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome YN2023ZH10State Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Projects SKLKY2024B0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent breast cancer prediction models typically rely on personal information and medical history, with limited inclusion of blood-based biomarkers. This study aimed to identify novel breast cancer risk factors using machine learning algorithms. By integrating both personal clinical factors and peripheral blood biochemical biomarkers, it sought to enhance the understanding of breast cancer risk.

methodsData were screened and normalized according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Logistic regression with forward selection and six other machine learning algorithms were employed to identify variables associated with breast cancer incidence. The performance of the models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) through 5-fold cross-validation.

resultsThe data were divided into a training cohort of 17,360 cases and a testing cohort of 8,551 cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that breast cancer incidence was increased with age (odds ratio [OR]:1.136, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.130, 1.142], P < 0.001), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (OR: 1.002, 95% CI: [1.000, 1.004], P = 0.014), and alanine transaminase (ALT) (OR: 1.005, 95% CI: [1.001, 1.008], P = 0.008). Furthermore, the six machine learning algorithms consistently identified GGT and ALT as the most significant predictive features. The AUC values obtained from the six models after 5-fold cross-validation ranged from 0.779 to 0.862, with accuracy ranging from 0.780 to 0.841.

conclusionsOur study identified two biochemical biomarkers (GGT and ALT) as promising indicators for breast cancer prediction. Incorporating these findings into a tailored breast cancer risk prediction model is needed in our future research.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdultAgedAlanine TransaminaseAlgorithmsFemalegamma-GlutamyltransferaseHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAlanine TransaminaseBiomarkers, Tumorgamma-GlutamyltransferaseBiochemical biomarkersBreast cancerMachine learningRisk factorValidation

Identifiers

PMID40597962
PMCPMC12211970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.