ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application of simulation-based education in the instruction of medical students from non-radiology specialties.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of a virtual simulation teaching model in enhancing the clinical understanding of cataract surgery among undergraduate medical students: a single-arm pre-post interventional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Integrated Radiology-Biochemistry Diagnostic Flow Framework for Emergency Clinical Decision Support: A Simulation-Based Educational Model.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Systematic and Narrative Review of Pedagogical Potential and Ethical Implications.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Enhancing Knowledge Integration and Self-Directed Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education Through an AI-Based Multimodal Platform.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Translation and psychometric validation of the Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale (MAIRS-MS) for Chinese medical students.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Exploration and practice of Medical Simulation Center construction under the background of New Medical Sciences.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCompetency in radiology among non-radiology medical students is crucial for enhancing the quality of clinical care. Simulation-based education (SBE) has the potential to address the limitations of tradition-based education (TBE) in teaching medical imaging to these students.
methodsA comparative study was conducted involving 317 second-year medical students specializing in non-radiology fields (Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, cohort 2019-2024). Participants received standardized instruction in medical imaging theory and skills (total score = 100). Based on the teaching approach, they were divided into SBE (n = 82) and TBE (n = 235) groups. Baseline performance was assessed prior to the intervention. The SBE group received traditional lectures supplemented with simulated skills training, while the TBE group received lectures combined with conventional skills training. Post-intervention assessments evaluated theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Students rated the effectiveness of the teaching methods on a 10-point scale regarding improvements in learning interest, imaging thinking, teamwork, and communication skills. Group comparisons were performed using Pearson's chi-square tests for categorical variables (e.g., gender) and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables (e.g., age, baseline scores, knowledge/skills scores, and ratings), with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsIn the SBE group (n = 82; M: F = 51:31), the median age was 20 years (IQR: 20, 20). Median baseline scores were 100.00 (IQR: 99.69, 100.00), theoretical knowledge scores were 93.25 (IQR: 89.88, 96.00), and practical skills scores were 96.00 (IQR: 93.00, 97.00). Median ratings for learning interest, imaging thinking, teamwork, and communication were 8.00 (IQR: 7.00, 8.00), 8.00 (IQR: 8.00, 9.00), 8.00 (IQR: 7.00, 9.00), and 8.00 (IQR: 8.00, 9.00), respectively. In the TBE group (n = 235; M: F = 130:105), the median age was also 20 years (IQR: 20, 20). Median baseline scores were 100.00 (IQR: 98.75, 100.00), theoretical knowledge scores were 71.00 (IQR: 66.50, 74.00), and practical skills scores were 82.00 (IQR: 80.00, 84.00). Median ratings for learning interest, imaging thinking, teamwork, and communication were 5.00 (IQR: 5.00, 6.00), 5.00 (IQR: 5.00, 6.00), 4.00 (IQR: 3.00, 5.00), and 2.00 (IQR: 2.00, 3.00), respectively. Groups were comparable at baseline (gender: χ² = 1.17, p = 0.28; age: Z = -1.26, p = 0.21; baseline scores: Z = -1.12, p = 0.26). The SBE group demonstrated significantly higher post-intervention theoretical knowledge scores (Z = -13.48, p < 0.001), practical skills scores (Z = -13.50, p < 0.001), and all rated domains (learning interest: Z = -13.23; imaging thinking: Z = -13.71; teamwork: Z = -13.77; communication: Z = -13.86; all p < 0.001).
conclusionsSBE significantly enhances the medical imaging knowledge and practical skills of non-radiology medical students compared to TBE. It also demonstrates superiority in fostering learning interest, imaging thinking, teamwork, and communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.