ArticleBMC medical education2025
Patient's awareness of their right and factors associated with it: a scoping review, 2024.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring patients' perspectives on patient rights in Latvia: from awareness to implementation and strengthening.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Assessing Patient Rights Awareness and Perceived Healthcare Compliance in Surgical Care: Evidence From Southern Iran.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this scoping review was how patients awareness of their right and factors associated with it frameworks across the literature.
objectiveA scoping review was conducted in order to systematically map the research done in patient's right awareness, as well as to identify any existing gaps in knowledge. And research question was formulated: What is known from the literature about patient's right, awareness of their right.
methodsA scoping review of literatures published in English was conducted using search engines: PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Scopus, AJOL, and Google for an institutional repository, from the beginning to December 15, 2024.
resultsApplication of the search strategy resulted in a total of 3920 articles. Twenty Two articles met inclusion criteria, of which 21 were analytical studies; 1 were descriptive research. Among this 22 studies, patient's awareness of their right ranges from 4.6 to 90%. Five factors are analyzed in common these are education level, age of the participant, number of hospital admission (previous admission history), gender and residency of the participant.
conclusionThis scoping review concludes that patient awareness is generally low, with various factors influencing it. However, studies conducted globally employ different methods, tools, and definitions of the issue. Therefore, further research is needed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.