ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Clinical events and patient-reported outcome measures in peritoneal dialysis.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Psychometric Testing of the Patient Safety Scale for Home Peritoneal Dialysis (PD-PSS).Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in Southeast Asia: a scoping review protocol with a focused North American comparator.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraditional markers of dialysis adequacy in peritoneal dialysis (PD) correlate poorly with both patient symptoms and outcomes, and residual kidney function remains the better determinant of each. Largely in response to these findings, guidelines now recommend focussing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in addition to assessing dialysis adequacy, where they have been shown to predict mortality, technique survival and hospitalisations. We aim to assess whether symptom burden measured by Palliative care Outcome Scale Symptom (POS-S)-renal questionnaire correlate with traditional markers of dialysis adequacy and is associated with future patient outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that the POS-S renal score does not correlate with traditional markers of dialysis adequacy but that it might be associated with future outcomes including mortality, technique survival and hospitalisations.
methodThis was a retrospective study on adult PD patients who underwent a POS-S-renal questionnaire within 2-weeks of their routine Peritoneal Equilibrium Test (PET)-Adequest test. We assessed for the association between POS-S renal scores with adequacy measures (Kt/V and creatinine clearance or CCr) and whether POS-S renal scores were associated with future outcomes (remaining on PD, transition to haemodialysis, kidney transplantation or death on PD).
resultsThere were 107 patients with at least one paired PET-Adequest and POS-S renal questionnaire. There was no correlation between markers of dialysis adequacy (CCr and Kt/V) and symptom burden measured by POS-S renal questionnaire. Higher symptom burden was associated with less favourable outcomes including technique failure, hospitalisations and death (p < 0.05). There was also an association between a higher symptom burden and a lower serum albumin level (p < 0.001).
conclusionThere was no association between markers of dialysis adequacy and the POS-S renal score; however, a higher POS-S renal score was associated with technique failure, hospitalisations and death compared to traditional markers. The measurement of PROMs may provide a beneficial addition to dialysis assessment in routine PD care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.