Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597929›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2025

Clinical events and patient-reported outcome measures in peritoneal dialysis.

Aruni Malaweera, Louis L Huang, Lawrence P McMahon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aruni MalaweeraDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health 5, Arnold Street, Box Hill, 3128, Australia. aruni.malaweera@monash.edu.
Louis L HuangDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health 5, Arnold Street, Box Hill, 3128, Australia.
Lawrence P McMahonDepartment of Renal Medicine, Eastern Health 5, Arnold Street, Box Hill, 3128, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional markers of dialysis adequacy in peritoneal dialysis (PD) correlate poorly with both patient symptoms and outcomes, and residual kidney function remains the better determinant of each. Largely in response to these findings, guidelines now recommend focussing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in addition to assessing dialysis adequacy, where they have been shown to predict mortality, technique survival and hospitalisations. We aim to assess whether symptom burden measured by Palliative care Outcome Scale Symptom (POS-S)-renal questionnaire correlate with traditional markers of dialysis adequacy and is associated with future patient outcomes. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesise that the POS-S renal score does not correlate with traditional markers of dialysis adequacy but that it might be associated with future outcomes including mortality, technique survival and hospitalisations.

methodThis was a retrospective study on adult PD patients who underwent a POS-S-renal questionnaire within 2-weeks of their routine Peritoneal Equilibrium Test (PET)-Adequest test. We assessed for the association between POS-S renal scores with adequacy measures (Kt/V and creatinine clearance or CCr) and whether POS-S renal scores were associated with future outcomes (remaining on PD, transition to haemodialysis, kidney transplantation or death on PD).

resultsThere were 107 patients with at least one paired PET-Adequest and POS-S renal questionnaire. There was no correlation between markers of dialysis adequacy (CCr and Kt/V) and symptom burden measured by POS-S renal questionnaire. Higher symptom burden was associated with less favourable outcomes including technique failure, hospitalisations and death (p < 0.05). There was also an association between a higher symptom burden and a lower serum albumin level (p < 0.001).

conclusionThere was no association between markers of dialysis adequacy and the POS-S renal score; however, a higher POS-S renal score was associated with technique failure, hospitalisations and death compared to traditional markers. The measurement of PROMs may provide a beneficial addition to dialysis assessment in routine PD care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPeritoneal DialysisAdultAgedFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAdequacyAssessmentDialysisPeritonealSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID40597929
PMCPMC12218817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.