ArticleBMC cancer2025
Orbital myoepithelial carcinoma: implications for diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGiven the rarity orbital myoepithelial carcinoma (OMC) and the paucity of current evidence characterizing its clinical profile, this study aims to summarize the clinical features and prognostic outcomes of OMC.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed a consecutive series of 12 patients with histopathologically confirmed OMC managed at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University (January 1, 2000-December 31, 2024), with evaluation of demographic data, clinical features, imaging findings, histopathological features, treatment modalities, prognostic outcomes, and follow-up records, using progression-free survival and overall survival as primary outcome measures alongside clinical presentation and imaging study assessments.
resultsTwelve patients (58.3% male, 7/12) were enrolled, with a mean age of 55.08 ± 14.46 years (range: 28-82). The mean age at initial detection of the tumor was 44.83 ± 18.89 years (range: 19-80). The most common initial presentation was abnormal globe position (41.7%). Tumors were generally large, with a maximum diameter ranging from 9.00 to 73.00 mm (median: 25.50 mm, IQR 18.75-35.25). Invasion into adjacent structures (sinonasal or intracranial) was observed in 41.7% (5/12) of cases. A history of prior neoplasms was noted in 83.3% (10/12) of patients, with pleomorphic adenoma (PA) accounting for 50%. MRI findings predominantly demonstrated lobulated cystic lesions with iso-intensity on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), iso- to hyper-intensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and heterogeneous enhancement. CT scans revealed soft-tissue density masses, with calcifications in 25% of cases and bone destruction of 66.7% cases. Histopathologically, hemorrhage/necrosis was identified in 63.6% (7/11), and perineural invasion in 18.2% (2/11). During a mean follow-up of 6.56 ± 3.36 years (range: 1-12) in 9 patients, the overall survival rate was 77.8%, with two disease-specific deaths at 6- and 8-years post-diagnosis. The recurrence rate was 55.6%, and all three patients with a history of PA experienced recurrence. The progression-free survival rate was 44.4%, with a median survival time of 3 years (IQR 2-6).
conclusionsOMC predominantly affects males, presents with large tumors prone to sinonasal/intracranial invasion and bone destruction, and carries a poor prognosis. Patients with PA-associated OMC exhibit exceptionally high recurrence rates, emphasizing the necessity of long-term postoperative surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.