ArticleBMC neurology2025
Development and validation of the antecedents affecting coping questionnaire in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopment of a self-report measure of antecedents affecting coping with multiple sclerosis lead to the identification of influential factors in the coping process and the provision of health cares with a focus on providing or modifying these factors. The current study aimed to develop and validate the antecedents affecting coping scale for multiple sclerosis patients.
methodsThis methodological study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the concept of coping antecedents was explained using qualitative content analysis approach through interview with 11 MS patients, then the initial items were extracted and the questionnaire was developed. In the second stage, reliability and validation of the questionnaire were evaluated including face, content and construct validity. The76 items in primary items pool reduced to 24 items after evaluating validity and reliability.
resultsFactor analyses revealed 5 factors: social support, awareness about disease, personal opinion and attitudes, spiritual - religious beliefs, and economic - environmental factors. Internal consistency and stability of the developed questionnaire as well as respectively confirmed with 0.92 and 0.95.
conclusionThe 24 items developed questionnaires is valid and reliable for measurement of antecedents affecting coping among multiple sclerosis patients in Iran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.