ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Expanding the scope of shared decision-making in vascular access planning for hemodialysis: a case for interprofessional collaboration.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Veteran perspectives on dialysis modality and vascular access communication in the United States veterans health administration: A qualitative study.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Lived Experiences of Women with Arteriovenous Fistula Undergoing Hemodialysis: A Phenomenological Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nurse-led shared decision-making for hemodialysis vascular access: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Supporting Shared Decision-Making in Life-Altering Kidney Therapy Decisions for Older Adults: A Review.JAMA internal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vascular access planning guidelines have shifted from a fistula-centered to a patient-centered approach. We advocate for expansion of the shared decision-making dyad between the nephrology team and patient to include other vascular access planning stakeholders. We propose earlier and consistent interprofessional collaboration facilitates more constructive discussions that could improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.