SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nonlinear duration-efficacy association of neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with chemoradiotherapy in pMMR/MSS locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy combined with immunotherapy in MMR‑proficient/microsatellite stable non‑metastatic rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‑analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Paradigm Shifts in Perioperative Management of Colorectal Cancer: Personalization Based on Tumor Biology, Primary Site, and Recurrence Risk, and the Evolving Role of Organ Preservation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Annual Review of Systemic Medical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer in 2025.Cancer innovation · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial fitness in circulating T cells predicts neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced colorectal cancer.Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Predictive value of NRI, NLR, PLR and LMR for therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in advanced rectal cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) represents a pivotal stage of rectal cancer where it is possible to completely cure the cancer before its systemic spread, thus often requiring an aggressive multimodal therapy. Recent trials suggest that programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors combined with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may improve treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors when integrated into neoadjuvant CRT regimens for LARC patients.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Library was conducted up to October 11, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing neoadjuvant CRT with or without PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included. The primary outcomes assessed were pathological complete response (pCR), clinical complete response (cCR), and serious adverse events (SAEs). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore variations in radiotherapy strategies, types of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors used, and mismatch repair (MMR) status.
resultsSix RCTs (861 patients) met the inclusion criteria. PD-1 inhibitors significantly improved pCR rates (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.32-3.32, p = 0.001), particularly with short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and agents like Camrelizumab and Tislelizumab. However, PD-1 inhibitors did not significantly enhance cCR (OR = 1.54, 95% CI: 0.51-4.63, p = 0.44) or increase SAEs (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.73-1.60). Subgroup analysis based on MMR status revealed a significantly higher pCR rate in the proficient MMR (pMMR) subgroup compared to the deficient MMR (dMMR) subgroup, although the result for dMMR was non-significant due to limited sample size and the absence of reported events.
conclusionsThe addition of PD-1 inhibitors to neoadjuvant CRT significantly improves pCR rates in LARC without increasing toxicity. These findings support their potential role in standard treatment protocols, warranting further phase III trials. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024619949.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.