ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Deep learning for gender estimation using hand radiographs: a comparative evaluation of CNN models.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Detection and Classification of Pleural Effusion on Computed Tomography Using Deep Learning.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting biological sex in pediatric skeleton X-rays using artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- YOLO11m-cls applied to sex and age classification based on the radiographic analysis of the nasal aperture.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Classification of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Hand Radiographs Interpretability Insights and Web Application.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate gender estimation plays a crucial role in forensic identification, especially in mass disasters or cases involving fragmented or decomposed remains where traditional skeletal landmarks are unavailable. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based model for gender classification using hand radiographs, offering a rapid and objective alternative to conventional methods.
methodsWe analyzed 470 left-hand X-ray images from adults aged 18 to 65 years using four convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures: ResNet-18, ResNet-50, InceptionV3, and EfficientNet-B0. Following image preprocessing and data augmentation, models were trained and validated using standard classification metrics: accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Data augmentation included random rotation, horizontal flipping, and brightness adjustments to enhance model generalization.
resultsAmong the tested models, ResNet-50 achieved the highest classification accuracy (93.2%) with precision of 92.4%, recall of 93.3%, and F1 score of 92.5%. While other models demonstrated acceptable performance, ResNet-50 consistently outperformed them across all metrics. These findings suggest CNNs can reliably extract sexually dimorphic features from hand radiographs.
conclusionsDeep learning approaches, particularly ResNet-50, provide a robust, scalable, and efficient solution for gender prediction from hand X-ray images. This method may serve as a valuable tool in forensic scenarios where speed and reliability are critical. Future research should validate these findings across diverse populations and incorporate explainable AI techniques to enhance interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.