ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Psychiatric emergencies: epidemiological analysis and healthcare professionals' experiences.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency departments ensure the safety of patients with mental health disorders and initiate psychiatric treatment. However, emergency workers experience several challenges in approaching patients with mental health disorders. It is essential to describe the epidemiological characteristics of cases and determine healthcare workers' opinions to identify the conditions that affect interventions. This study aimed to examine the epidemiology of patients evaluated for psychiatric emergencies in the emergency department and reveal healthcare professionals' experiences with emergency psychiatric cases.
methodsThe study comprised two parts. First, patients who attended Bilecik Training and Research Hospital's Emergency Department with psychiatric emergencies between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023, were retrospectively examined. Second, using a phenomenological design and qualitative methodology, healthcare professionals were interviewed about their experiences and opinions regarding approaching patients who attended the emergency department with psychiatric emergencies and their diagnosis, treatment, and outcome processes.
resultsIn the first part of the study, 1621 patients were evaluated during the study period: 163 were aged < 18 years and 1458 were aged ≥ 18 years, while 1079 were female (67.0%). In terms of diagnoses, 1417 (87.4%) were evaluated for anxiety and 74 (4.6%) for suicide attempts. In the second part, four themes and 11 categories emerged from the analysis of the interviews conducted with healthcare professionals. These themes were the path from fear to stigmatization, the necessity of therapeutic relationships, the necessity of change in intervention conditions, and the factors that change the meaning of the experience.
conclusionsThis study stresses the importance of considering healthcare professionals' experiences and highlights the necessity for change in the emergency department. It is anticipated that fulfilling these needs will reduce acute distress and improve the safety and recovery of patients presenting with psychiatric emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.