ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis in the general population of the Paris region according to FIB-4 score and liver risk score.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe ideal non-invasive marker to identify patient at risk for liver fibrosis in the general population is unknown. Current guidelines (EASL) recommend using the FIB-4 score as a screening tool but the low specificity may result in a large number of potentially false-positive results. Recently, the liver risk score (LRS) has been suggested to more accurately identify patients at-risk. The aim of our study was to identify populations at-risk using the two scores. MATERIALS AND
methods“Cerbafib” was a prospective cohort derived from laboratories throughout the Paris region. The prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis was assessed using the non-invasive FIB-4 score with a cut-off of 2.67 (rule-in) and 1.3 (rule-out) and the LRS with a cut-off of < 6 (minimal risk), ≥ 6 to < 10 (low risk), ≥ 10 to < 15 (medium risk) and ≥ 15 (high risk).
resultsBetween January and April 2023, 179 865 patients were included in the cohort. The mean age was 52 years and 45% were men. FIB-4 identified 55 376 (31%) patients requiring specialist referral ( ≥ = 1.3) and 4002 patients (2.2%) with suspected advanced fibrosis. LRS identified 38 175 (21%) patients with estimated liver stiffness ≥ 6 kPa, 1 933 patients (1%) ≥ 10 kPa and 35 (0.02%) patients ≥ 15 kPa. There was a poor correlation between the two tests (r = 0.45).
conclusionThe Liver Risk Score is a practical tool to identify a population in need of further hepatologic evaluation. Compared to FIB-4, the population identified by LRS is smaller and different. An adapted new pragmatic screening algorithm using LRS should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.