ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Association of anaesthesia type with one-year mortality after surgery in elderly patients: a secondary retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine whether regional anaesthesia (RA) versus general anaesthesia (GA) is associated with the one-year postoperative mortality among the older surgical patients.
methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study from 2012 to 2016. Patients aged 70 years or older who underwent surgery were included, and those who underwent transplantation, burn surgery, or minor procedures were excluded. The primary exposure was anaesthesia type (RA vs. GA); the main outcome was one-year all-cause mortality, which was verified through hospital records and a national registry. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were included as covariates. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were used to evaluate the independent effect of anaesthesia methods on one-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed survival rates by anaesthesia method, with log-rank tests comparing the curves. MAIN
resultsAmong 16,599 older adults, 29.7% received RA. The one-year mortality rate was lower in the RA group (6.44%) than in the GA group (9.52%), yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.82). K‒M analyses revealed improved survival in the RA group (log-rank P < 0.05). Propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analyses corroborated these findings. The E-value of 2.12 demonstrates the robustness of the results against unmeasured confounding.
conclusionsRegional anaesthesia may be linked to better one-year survival in older patients. Although other confounding factors cannot be excluded, these findings underscore the need for multicenter, prospective investigations to inform perioperative decisions in geriatric populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.