ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Unilateral postoperative visual loss after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a case report.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postoperative visual loss (POVL) after non-ocular surgeries is rare, and its occurrence following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is exceedingly uncommon. A 60-year-old male with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus underwent PCNL in the prone position for a right renal calculus. Shortly after surgery, he reported unilateral visual loss. Ophthalmologic assessment revealed profound vision impairment in the right eye. Imaging confirmed occlusion of the right ophthalmic artery. A multidisciplinary team including ophthalmology, neurology, and interventional radiology coordinated prompt intervention. Emergency intra-arterial thrombolysis restored blood flow and led to gradual recovery of visual function. This case illustrates a rare but serious complication of POVL due to ophthalmic artery occlusion after PCNL. Prompt recognition and timely multidisciplinary intervention were key to successful visual recovery. Clinicians should remain vigilant for POVL in high-risk patients undergoing prone-position surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.