Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40597613›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Automated sparse feature selection in high-dimensional proteomics data via 1-bit compressed sensing and K-Medoids clustering.

FuDong Wen, Yue Su, Dan Liu, YuPeng Wang, MeiNa Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

FuDong WenDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Yue SuDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China.
YuPeng WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China. wangyupeng@hrbmu.edu.cn.
MeiNa LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Public Health College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin City, 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China. liumeina369@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173614National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China 82003556
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-dimensional proteomics data present significant challenges in biomarker discovery due to technical noise, feature redundancy, and multicollinearity. Current feature selection methods, including filter, wrapper, and embedded approaches, struggle with stability, sparsity, and computational efficiency. To address these limitations, we propose Soft-Thresholded Compressed Sensing (ST-CS), a hybrid framework integrating 1-bit compressed sensing with K-Medoids clustering. Unlike conventional methods relying on manual thresholds, ST-CS automates feature selection by dynamically partitioning coefficient magnitudes into discriminative biomarkers and noise.

resultsEvaluations on simulated and real-world proteomic datasets demonstrated ST-CS's superiority in feature selection capability and classification performance. In simulations, ST-CS achieved feature selection robustness with balanced sensitivity (> 80%) and specificity (> 99.8%), reducing false discovery rates (FDR) by 20-50% compared to Hard-Thresholded Compressed Sensing (HT-CS). Additionally, it attained superior F1 scores and Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC), outperforming HT-CS, LASSO, and SPLSDA in identifying true biomarkers while suppressing noise. For classification performance, ST-CS surpassed all methods in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) across varying noise levels while maintaining sparsity. Applied to Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) datasets, ST-CS matched HT-CS's classification accuracy (AUC = 97.47% for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) but with 57% fewer selected features (37 vs. 86), demonstrating its dual strength in precision biomarker discovery and predictive accuracy. For glioblastoma data, ST-CS achieved higher AUC (72.71%) than HT-CS (72.15%), LASSO (67.80%), and SPLSDA (71.38%) while retaining a parsimonious feature set (30 vs. 58 features for HT-CS). In ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, ST-CS further demonstrated its adaptability, attaining superior AUC (75.86%) over HT-CS (75.61%), LASSO (61.00%), and SPLSDA (70.75%) with only 24 ± 5 selected biomarkers. These results highlight ST-CS's ability to rigorously automate feature selection while balancing classification efficacy, interpretability, and scalability for translational proteomics.

Indexed as

Data CompressionProteomicsAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorCluster AnalysisHumansBiomarkers, TumorClassificationCompressed sensingFeature selectionK-Medoids clusteringProteomics

Identifiers

PMID40597613
PMCPMC12220089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.