ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Forelimb feathering, soft tissues, and skeleton of the flying dromaeosaurid Microraptor.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicroraptor is an essential animal for understanding the evolution of flight in birds and their closest relatives. Recent studies have uncovered evidence of its powered flight potential and details of its diet and ecology. However, we are still missing a thorough description of the anatomy of Microraptor connecting feathers, soft tissues, and osteology together. Here we focus on the forelimbs of ten new Microraptor specimens from the Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature studied under Laser-Stimulated Fluorescence. We compared our results with extensively studied existing specimens (e.g., IVPP V13352 and BMNHC PH881), other key early paravians (e.g., Anchiornis, Archaeopteryx and Confuciusornis), as well as modern birds to expand what we know about flight origins, and early diverging paravian theropods more generally.
resultsPlumage was previously only minimally known. Reconstruction of the forewings relied on brief descriptions of the primary and secondary feathers. With the new specimens studied here, we uncovered the whole shape of the wing from the tip of the digits to the proximal end of the ulna, the different layers of feathers, and the number as well as characteristics of each feather type. Skeletal features of the forelimb remain mostly unchanged from previous descriptions, but we bring new information regarding wrist bones and functional implications of humerus and radius features. The most significant advances have been recovered in preserved soft tissues including those of the shoulder, propatagium and postpatagium. In particular, the new specimens of Microraptor help us to understand the impact of the soft tissues on lift generation and cohesiveness of the forewing.
conclusionsThis study permitted us to recreate the most accurate forewing of Microraptor to date. Taken together, new information on the forelimb anatomy shows that Microraptor shares many of the forewing characteristics of early avialans and modern birds, and helps us to better understand the flight behaviour and ecology of this iconic and unique 'four-winged' animal along with its role in flight evolution. These results serve as a starting point to conduct more precise and integrative analyses (e.g., including hindwings and/or tail) on the locomotor behaviours of Microraptor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.