Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Outcomes of rhomboid intercostal plane block on local anaesthesia in cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06449599 (Outcomes of Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Local Anesthesia in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcomes of Rhomboid Intercostal Plane Block on Local Anesthesia in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB) in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation (CIED): A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The efficacy of serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block performed under ultrasound guidance in thoracic postherpetic neuralgia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- The Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Treatment on Sleep and Quality of Life in Fibromyalgia: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRhomboid intercostal plane block (RIB) has been described in the last decade. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of RIB in terms of perioperative analgesia and patient and physician satisfaction in patients undergoing CIED.
methodsThe randomized controlled trial was structured into two arms, each comprising 25 patients and allocation was performed using a sealed-envelope randomization technique. Local anaesthesia group-LAG received only local anaesthesia (LA) (prilocaine 2%) as the standard procedure. RIB group-RIBG received RIB in addition to the standard procedure. Demographic and clinical data about the patients and the procedures performed were recorded. The first and second rescue treatments in cases of pain during the procedure and the first and second rescue treatments during the postoperative follow-up were also recorded. Pain levels during the procedure, at the end of the procedure and 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after the procedure were determined according to the NRS-11(Numeric Rating Scale-11). Patient and physician satisfaction were recorded on a five-point Likert scale. The primary outcome of the study was the efficacy of RIB in patients undergoing CIED implantation, assessed by NRS-11 pain scores during the procedure and in the postoperative period. As secondary outcome, patient and physician satisfaction levels were evaluated during the procedure.
resultsThere was less need for additional local anaesthetic in the RIBG than in the LAG (p < 0.001). NRS-11 scores during implantation, at the end of the implantation procedure, and at the 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-hour follow-ups were greater in the LAG (p < 0.001). The satisfaction levels of both doctors and patients were higher in the RIBG (p < 0.001).
conclusionsRIB application in CIED implantations showed adequate analgesic efficacy in patients during the perioperative period and up to 24 h postoperatively. At the same time, it provided high procedural satisfaction for patients and physicians. RIB should be considered in the multimodal analgesia approach in the perioperative analgesia of this patient group. There is a need for collaboration between anaesthesiologists and cardiologists to establish protocols, including RIB, for perioperative pain management in patients who undergo CIED implantation.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the Clinical Trials (ID: NCT06449599, 27/05/2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.